Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, institutions of higher education are facing significant revenue challenges and incurring extra expenses for which their insurance programs should provide relief. Potentially covered sources of loss and damage include (1) efforts to make buildings safe for students, faculty, staff, and administrators, (2) tuition adjustments, loss of athletic and extra-curricular events revenue and related sponsorships, and (3) extra expenses and/or lost revenue related to student housing issues.

Property and business interruption policies may provide broad coverage in response to COVID-19 under the following:

  • Communicable disease
  • Physical loss or damage
  • Protection and preservation of property
  • Civil or military authority
  • Contingent time element extended
  • Attraction property
  • Ingress/egress
  • Claim preparation costs

Despite the anticipated financial backstop to be provided by these coverages to higher education institutions, the insureds instead have found that insurers have wrongfully failed and refused to pay COVID-19 insurance claims. Below, we explain how insurers have erred in interpreting these coverages as applied to COVID-19 claims by colleges and universities.

Communicable Disease Coverage

Many of higher education institutions purchased policies with specific communicable disease coverage. In those policies, communicable disease response coverage applies if a communicable disease is present (not suspected) on a location owned, leased, or rented by the institution if access to that location is limited, restricted, or prohibited by an order of authorized governmental authority or a decision of an officer of the institution. If this occurs, the policy covers the reasonable and necessary costs incurred for cleanup, removal, and disposal, and the actual fees payable to public relations services or the cost of using university employees for reputation management. Likewise, the interruption by communicable disease coverage applies under the same circumstances once access is affected for at least 48 hours, triggering the insurer’s obligation to pay the institution’s lost profits or lost tuition fees. Tuition fees coverage is commonly defined as fees which are prevented from being earned or received, other income derived from routine and special services, or other operating and non-operating revenue, donations, and fundraising proceeds less the cost of goods, supplies, or services sold or purchased which do not continue under the contract. Communicable disease coverage is also likely to be triggered by a government mandate affecting the institution’s ability to deliver its expected services to students, faculty, and staff.

COVID-19 Causes “Physical Loss or Damage,” Triggering Other Coverages

Beyond the communicable disease coverage, most business interruption policies sold to institutions of higher education require “physical loss or damage” to trigger the coverage. In a policy with communicable disease coverage, a “communicable disease,” by definition constitutes “physical loss or damage” in all coverages despite carriers’ arguments to the contrary. For policies without specific communicable disease coverage, policyholders must look to their own state laws for interpretation of this broad, ambiguous policy term, but the plain meaning of “physical loss or damage” should apply to losses from COVID-19.

Once the institution overcomes the threshold physical loss or damage issue (and absent an express communicable disease exclusion in the policy—other exclusions should not apply), a higher education institution should be entitled to coverage for COVID-19-related losses and costs under several additional sections of the policy. Although policy language can vary, coverage is usually provided for the following:

  • Protection and preservation of property covers the costs to temporarily protect or preserve insured property due to actual, or to prevent immediately impending, insured physical loss or damage to insured property.
  • Civil or military authority provides coverage for extra expenses or lost revenues “if an order of civil or military authority limits, restricts or prohibits partial or total access to an insured location provided such order is the direct result of physical damage of the type insured at the insured location or within [a specified number of] statute miles or kilometers of it.”
  • Contingent time element extended coverage applies where the institution experiences a loss due to “physical loss or damage” to any location “of a direct customer, supplier, contract manufacturer or contract service provider to the Insured.” (i.e., if the students are banned from attending the institution because of physical damage or loss to their property due to presence of COVID-19.)
  • An institution of higher education may also be able to show losses from an attraction property within a specified distance of an insured locations. Attraction property covers extra expenses and lost revenues resulting from physical loss or damage to other locations that attract business/students to an insured location.
  • Ingress/egress coverage may apply when access to an institution is interrupted due to partial or total physical prevention of ingress to or egress from an insured location.

Higher Education Institutions Should Involve Counsel

To date, insurers have been requiring higher education policyholders to respond to lengthy questionnaires regarding the legal and factual basis of COVID-19 claims. As insurers are so far zealously refusing to cover COVID-19-related losses under property and business interruption policies, it is becoming apparent that higher education institutions will be forced to litigate coverage under these policies. They should be taking steps to properly present and preserve their claims by consulting counsel when responding to questionnaires or starting to consider making claims.

Perkins Coie is committed to providing assistance through no-cost reviews of COVID-19 property/business interruption claims for higher education institutions and, as appropriate, litigating these claims on an alternative fee basis. In addition, we have developed a number of resources for policyholders available on our website.

In 1964, futurist Arthur C. Clarke predicted that in 50 years, people “will no longer commute—they will communicate.” For a significant portion of the American workforce, the future is now. COVID-19 has fundamentally changed how we communicate: The virtual meeting is suddenly our primary means of interaction with coworkers. Video conferencing platforms like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Cisco’s WebEx have seen unprecedented spikes in active users. As companies transition from triage to planning for the new normal, the prevalence of video conferencing has serious implications for commercial litigation. Face-to-face discussions that were only memorialized by meeting notes or related correspondence can be fully preserved as video files, subject to discovery. It is therefore essential to understand the technical functionality of virtual meeting recordings and the likely legal obligations that accompany them.

Click here to read more.

The insurance industry in the United States continues to thwart legislative solutions for disputed COVID-19-related losses under property/business interruption policies and resists efforts to group lawsuits together into multi-district federal litigation or class actions. Meanwhile, the independent regulator of insurers in the United Kingdom, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), is trying to take a more organized and direct approach. Although the FCA indicated that it did not believe coverage existed for most claims for COVID-19-related losses, the FCA has identified the key language at issue in the various insurance policies, the universal or prevalent facts presented, and the legal questions posed. The regulator has announced an initiative to begin resolving these disputed claims by bringing a series of test cases in U.K. courts to answer these coverage questions. Though the test cases are being resolved under the law of the United Kingdom, the outcomes are likely to influence American courts that are grappling with many of the same issues under similar insurance policy language. Depending on the success of the test cases in streamlining these disputes in the U.K., U.S. policyholders may want to consider adopting a similar approach to fast-track their claims towards settlement.

Click here to read more.

In the latest episode of the podcast series Insurance Considerations Amid COVID-19, we are joined by Deborah White, president of the Retail Litigation Center (RLC) and senior executive vice president and general counsel of the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA). Deborah provides insight and analysis regarding the retail industry’s varied and innovative response to the pandemic, including how large retailers deal with the patchwork of evolving state and local regulations and how they are innovating at breakneck speed to meet consumer demand while maintaining safety for employees, suppliers, and customers. Not surprisingly, we also talk about masks, how we all got our start in retail, and a little … insurance.

Continue Reading Podcast Series: Key Insurance Considerations Amid COVID-19

General liability coverage is insurance that responds to sums that the policyholder is legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury or property damage to third parties (and generally will also include either a duty to defend such claims or to reimburse defense costs). Thus, general liability coverage would respond to such tort claims as slip-and-fall lawsuits and product liability exposures. In addition, most such policies also cover certain enumerated personal or advertising injury offenses (such as defamation or disparagement).

Most general liability policies are written on an “occurrence” basis. An occurrence-based general liability policy is triggered to respond by bodily injury or property damage taking place during its policy period, regardless of when the claim is made against a policyholder. Given multi-year statutes of limitations for many torts and the possibility of latent injuries, this means that it is frequently a prior year’s occurrence policy (or policies, for long-term injury claims) that responds to a claim that comes in during the current year.

Continue Reading Key Issues to Consider When Contemplating a Switch From an Occurrence-Based to a Claims-Made General Liability Insurance Program

As the COVID-19 pandemic spreads across the globe, countries have by and large placed limitations on how certain businesses can operate and have required other businesses to temporarily cease operations altogether. Businesses impacted by these restrictions have suffered substantial financial losses and, unsurprisingly, are looking to their business interruption insurers to cover these losses. As businesses begin to make business interruption claims, a stark contrast is arising between how U.S. and European insurers and governments are handling the influx of such claims related to COVID-19.

Continue Reading United States vs. Europe: How Insurers Have Responded to Business Interruption Claims Related to COVID-19

What is Business Interruption Coverage?

Business Interruption Coverage is a type of insurance coverage that compensates you for lost revenue when your business is unable to operate for a period as result of some physical property loss or damage caused by a covered peril. The most common example is a fire that damages a business property. If that damage prevents a business from operating as usual, business interruption coverage could provide the revenue your company would have made during the time it was unable to operate because the building was being restored. While a fire could certainly damage a tech company’s property, a tech company might be more vulnerable than other companies to certain types of damage, such as a weather-related event that knocks out the temperature controls in a data center, thereby resulting in the loss of, or damage to, electronic data. While nearly all companies in this day and age store data electronically, a data center can be more of the heart and soul of tech company than other types of companies. Continue Reading Fundamentals of Business Interruption Coverage—What Tech Startups Might Need to Know

Cryptocurrency is a digital or virtual asset that relies on cryptography to verify and secure transactions. Most cryptocurrencies have no central regulatory authority (i.e., the federal government), but rather run on decentralized systems through the use of blockchain technology to record transactions and assign new “tokens.” While blockchains provide a high sense of security and self-regulation, they are not risk-free. The insurance market has been slow to enter the cryptocurrency world, but some insurers have, and others are starting to explore this new terrain. In this blog, we provide a short overview of what you should know about cryptocurrency insurance in order to decide whether it’s right for you and/or your company.

Continue Reading Cryptocurrency Insurance 101

By Nicholas Gellert

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many business locations are shuttered, with work being done, if at all, only remotely. In addition, many businesses or owners of real property may have already filed or are considering filing insurance claims for associated losses from not being able to use their owned or leased premises. The purpose of this piece is to caution owners or tenants to review their property policies closely for vacancy-related conditions or exclusions.

Continue Reading COVID-19 Insurance Alert: Review Insurance Policies for Vacancy-Related Provisions

By Jay Rossiter, Les Brown

There is growing evidence that the insurance industry is taking a concerted, joint approach to denying business interruption claims that relate in any way to COVID-19. Even if a business purchased insurance to protect against business interruption, civil authority orders, and other related events, insurance companies are discouraging and/or denying such claims without even reviewing the specific facts or insurance policy language that might be at issue. Unfortunately, insurance brokers and agents—on whom many businesses rely to give them advice in the first instance—are also discouraging claims. California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara issued a directive on April 14, 2020 to address this inappropriate and damaging conduct.

Continue Reading California Insurance Commissioner Issues Notice Requiring Heightened Scrutiny for Business Interruption Claims